Factors important in laryngology fellow and laryngology fellowship selection.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To determine factors that laryngology fellowship directors believe are most important in choosing a fellow and that laryngology applicants believe are most important in choosing a program. The number of laryngology fellowship programs and the number of laryngology fellowship applicants have been increasing in recent years. Selection criteria in choosing a fellow or fellowship program have not been studied. METHODS Survey study using anonymous online questionnaires of laryngology fellowship directors and recent laryngology fellowship applicants. Directors were asked to rate qualities for judging the strength of a fellowship applicant. Applicants were assessed for the importance of various factors in choosing a fellowship. RESULTS Sixteen of 27 fellowship directors (59%) and 33 of 53 fellowship applicants (62%) contacted responded to the survey. Program directors listed interview performance, letters of recommendation, and personal knowledge of applicant as the most important factors. Gender or ethnicity, previous research in laryngology, and likelihood that the applicant will rank the director's program highly were ranked as least important factors. Applicants ranked personal rapport with fellowship mentor(s), large experience in endoscopic surgeries, and reputation of mentor(s) as most important, whereas call schedule, salary, and having more than one fellow per year were ranked as least important factors. CONCLUSION Interview performance, trusted colleague's recommendation, and personal knowledge were ranked as the most important factors in fellow selection. These criteria are consistent with previous research on otolaryngology residency and pediatric otolaryngology fellow selection. When selecting a fellowship, laryngology fellowship applicants choose based on personal rapport with mentor, opportunity to learn endoscopic surgeries, and mentor reputation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.
منابع مشابه
Laryngology litigation in the United States: Thirty years in review.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Malpractice claims pertaining to laryngology procedures are a potentially important source of information that could be used to minimize the risk of future litigation and improve patient care. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of two publicly available databases containing jury verdicts and settlements. METHODS The LexisNexis Jury Verdicts and Settlements and Westlaw...
متن کاملMyringoplasty.
There is marked diversity in the reported success rates for achieving an intact tympanic membrane following myringoplasty. Controversy exists about the factors thought to influence surgical outcome. Both of these facts have important implications for obtaining informed consent prior to surgery. This study reviews the factors thought to determine the likelihood of achieving complete closure of t...
متن کاملLymphoma of larynx presented with hoarseness: Case report
Primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the larynx is rare, accounting for less than 1% of all laryngeal neoplasms. Fewer than 100 cases have been reported in the literatureand to our knowledge this may be the first reported case of laryngeal non Hodgkin lymphoma presented with hoarseness, aortic aneurysm, hepatitis B and skin rashes.
متن کاملWaardenburg Syndrome in an Arab Family
By Laman Amin -ZaKI (Baghdad), The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 1971.
متن کاملAn overview of hereditary hearing loss.
Understanding the genetic basis of hearing loss is important because almost 50% of profound hearing loss are caused by genetic factors and more than 120 independent genes have been identified. In this review, after a brief explanation of some genetic terms (allele, heterozygosis, homozygosis, polymorphism, genotype and phenotype), classification of genetic hearing loss (syndromic versus nonsynd...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Laryngoscope
دوره 125 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015